Researchers wave around long examined the formation of love. Approximating is an leading analyst of happiness, discharge, and positive emotions in our lives (Anderson, 1977; Diener Myers, 1992). Polished the duration, put on are wave around been lots diverse conceptualizations of love. In unique, Lee (1973; 1988) celebrated six types of love: pragma, ludus, storge, agape, obsession, and eros. I be on familiar terms with what you're thinking; what the hell is up with these names? Remedy, lots of these are Greek translations of the word love.
YOU can find out YOUR love style by completing the survey beneath called the Approximating Attitudes Moment, which was bent by Hendrick and Hendrick in 1986. Approximating Attitudes ScaleINSTRUCTIONSGet out a segment of paper. Come out that segment of paper from 1 to 42. For each of the 42 statements, ring down the number that highest nearly describes your attitudes or credo. Certified of the stuff transfer to a open love relationship, because others transfer to regular attitudes and credo about love. Whenever achievable, answer the questions with your current associate in mind. If you are not promptly dating, answer the questions with your highest forward-looking associate in mind. If you wave around never been in love or in a relationship former, answer in language of what you think your responses would highest innate be.
Set great store by each tale on a bulk of 1 to 5: 1 = mightily disagree2 = disagree3 = neutral4 = agree5 = mightily arrange
1. My associate and I were attracted to each extra short-lived behindhand we first met.2. I try to keep my lover a sad unsound about my commitment to him/her.3. It is hard to say without delay wherever friendship ends and love begins.4. I keep what a person is operate to become in life former I provide myself to him/her.5. The same as possessions aren't right with my lover and me, my put up with gets shock.6. I try to interminably help my lover listed gloomy times.7. My associate and I wave around the right physical "chemistry" amongst us.8. I convoy that what my lover doesn't be on familiar terms with about me won't wronged him/her.9. Matchless love first requires thoughtful for a because.10. I try to representation my life circumspectly former choosing a lover.11. The same as my love associations break up, I get depressed.12. I would incredible caress myself than let my lover caress.13. Our lovemaking is very strong and becoming.14. I wave around sometimes had to keep two of my lovers from wisdom out about each extra.15. I suppose to interminably be friends with the one I love.16. It is best to love get down with a packed keep details.17. Sometimes I get so heated about being in love that I can't doze.18. I cannot be happy unless I place my lover's happiness former my own.19. I feel that my lover and I were hypothetical for each extra.20. I can get over love associations unusual purely and pithily.21. The best melodious of love grows out of a long friendship.22. A main planning in choosing a lover is how he/she reflects on my family.23. The same as my lover doesn't pay attention to me, I feel nauseous all over.24. I am traditionally spirited to disbursement my own wishes to let my lover improvement his/hers.25. My associate and I became excitably entangled incredible pithily.26. My associate would get shock if he/she knew some of the possessions I've accomplished with extra people.27. Our friendship combined gradually into love over time.28. An leading part in choosing a associate is whether or not he/she will be a good parent.29. The same as I am in love, I wave around trouble concentrating.30. Doesn't matter what I own is my lover's to use as he/she chooses.31. My associate and I fatally understand each extra.32. The same as my lover gets too district on me, I want to back off a sad.33. Approximating is fatally a significant friendship not a mysterious, paranormal emotion.34. One planning in choosing a associate is how he/she will contemplate on my career.35. I cannot stay if I questionable that my lover is with get down moreover.36. The same as my lover gets definite with me, I still love him/her unequivocally and absolutely.37. My associate fits my perfect principles of physical beauty/handsomeness.38. I operate playing the "contest of love" with a number of diverse associates.39. My highest becoming love relationships wave around been suitable from good friendships.40. Previous getting very entangled with any person, I try to figurine out how of one mind his/her natural keep details is with fund in funnel we ever wave around little.41. If my lover ignores me for a because, I do stupid possessions to get his/her attention back.42. I would endure all possessions for the sake of my lover.
On top INSTRUCTIONSNow, add up your scores for each group of stop beneath. Higher scores predict higher levels of that love style.
Pragma- Add stop for items: 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, ">Eros- Add stop for items: 1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, ">Ludus- Add stop for items: 2, 8, 14, 20, 26, 32, ">Storge- Add stop for items: 3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33, ">Mania- Add stop for items: 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 35, ">Agape- Add stop for items: 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, ">
It's considerably if you don't wave around one release victorious love style. Several those wave around a unification of 2-3 love styles.
So, what does your love style mean?Individuals w/ a pragma love style...1. are practical-minded2. undertake compatibility in social and personal qualities3. objectively search for apparent qualities they want in a mate4. are mull over about commitment5. want to be on familiar terms with get down well former becoming intimate6. feel that seeking an optimal match is the only logical way to find a mate7. do not service physical attraction as knowingly as extra attributes
Those w/ an eros love style...1. feel strong, excited emotions about their mates2. traditionally wave around a strong commitment to their relationship3. convoy in love at first sight4. want nearness, along with sexual nearness, fast on in a relationship5. are very affectionate6. feel rest gone they are in love7. are not traditionally obsessive or jealous8. communicate openly9. service physical attraction
Those w/ a ludus love style...1. dearth the "contest" of love2. like comprise in their partners3. wave around no problem dating enhanced than one person at a time4. convoy you can love enhanced than one person at any resolution time5. are not very emotional6. don't traditionally involve themselves in essential relationships7. avoid commitment8. can be deceitful and views as refinement as defensible
Those w/ a storge love style...1. operate a loyal, without airs love with others2. service friendship and stability3. convoy that love is an extension of friendship4. are conjure up, apportionment activities and popular interests5. do not service physical attraction6. like to feel familiarized in a relationship7. are not entangled in excitably charged relationships8. can keep couples entangled in a relationship gone eros dies down
Those w/ a obsession love style...1. are obsessive and jealous2. are very emotional3. are retiring about their relationships4. painful feeling nearness quickly5. are superb by their fear of rejection or abandonment6. like use too knowingly time with their lovers7. are systematically described as being "in love with love"8. signify a great proposition of affection9. are systematically in relationships with contradictory others as f their painful feeling to be in love
Those w/ an agape love style...1. are systematically referred to as those with selfless or helpful love2. believes in lithe love as any person is admirable of it3. love others without expecting whatsoever in return4. do not wave around any physical attraction requirements5. are traditionally non-demanding, very kind, and supportive6. convoy in goodness in relationships7. are not intensely emotional
Through college students, the highest sought-after love styles are storge and agape, and the negligible sought-after love style is ludus (Hahn & Blass, 1997). Moreover, highest those partiality, and are happier with, a associate with the exceedingly love style(s) as themselves (Davis Hahn ">
References:
* Anderson, M. R. (1977). A study of the relationship amongst life discharge and management, locus of fasten, discharge with head relationships, and work discharge (Doctoral homily, Michigan Say University circles, 1977). Piece Abstracts International, 38, 26389A, (University circles Microfilm No. 77-25, 214).
* Davis, K. E., ">Journal of Convivial and Time-honored Affairs, 4, 409-428.
* Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (2000). Subjective emotional well-being. In M. Lewis ">Handbook of emotions (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Manipulation.
* Hahn, J., ">Journal of Convivial Bearing and Person, 12, 595-610.
* Hendrick, C., ">Journal of Person and Convivial Psychology, 50, 392-402.
* Lee, J. A. (1973). The emblem of love: An delve into of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Manipulation. (Concerning Problem, 1976).
* Lee, J. A. (1988). Love-styles. In R. J. Sternberg ">The psychology of love (pp. 38-67). New Retreat, CT: Yale University circles Manipulation.
* Myers, D. G. (1992). The hunt of happiness: Who is happy and why? New York: William Morrow ">For enhanced information about Lee's six love styles, see the last resources:
* While is this doodad called love?
* What's your love style?
Snap Acquaint with to take on original one of my "monday day surveys."
0 comments:
Post a Comment